The failure of Italy’s last vote wasn’t just a missed opportunity,  it was a choreographed silence. Beneath it lies a politics of inertia, and a deeper civic wound

Only when the noise fades can silence speak louder than words, deafening in its own way. On June 8 and 9, Italy held a vote on five abrogative proposals concerning employment law, workplace safety, and access to citizenship. More than the issues themselves, what truly matters is how the referendum’s build-up, public perception, and final results mirror the grand scheme of Italian politics.

Four of the five questions aimed to roll back parts of the 2015 Jobs Act, introduced by then-Prime Minister Matteo Renzi to modernise the labour market but which, in practice, fostered greater precarity. The Italian General Confederation of Labour (CGIL) collected nearly four million signatures, appealing to the often-exploited working class. Following popular demands, voters were asked whether to restore tougher protections against illegitimate layoffs, abolish the current cap limiting severance pay to six months for wrongful dismissal in small firms, require employers to justify fixed-term contracts up to 12 months, and broaden liability for on-the-job accidents in subcontracted work.

The fifth focused on cutting the residency requirement for citizenship from 10 to 5 years for non-EU residents, a population estimated at around 3.5 million. Promoted by a coalition of civic organizations and left-wing parties, notably AVS (Alleanza Verdi e Sinistra) and +Europa, with support from parts of the Democratic Party (PD), the campaign gathered over 637,000 endorsements. All five points, though varied in scope, sought to realign the law with a more redistributive and inclusive vision of citizenship, both economic and civic.

Despite mobilisation efforts, none reached the legally required quorum of 50% plus one participant. Nationwide turnout barely surpassed 30%. This failure, while procedural, reveals a deeper pattern: Italy consistently ranks among Western Europe’s lowest in voter participation.

The system itself discourages involvement.

In a paradox typical of Italian bureaucracy, residents abroad are able to vote by mail, while those living within the country without updated registration are forced to go to the polls in their place of birth or official family residence. This creates significant barriers, especially for workers and young, mobile citizens. The rigid residency rule stands as a structural impediment to democratic engagement. In effect, the referendum excluded many of its intended beneficiaries.

Moreover, the government’s active boycott of the referendum and notable lack of national media coverage shaped public perception and fueled widespread abstentionism. This deliberate silence from those in power exposes Italy’s entrenched political immobilism.

Boycott from above: When silence speaks louder

The political leadership sent unmistakable signals to boycott the proposals from above. Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, head of the ruling coalition, has traditionally portrayed voting as a sacred civic duty, portraying abstainers as threats to democracy and casting participation as a patriotic act, in classic far-right populist fashion. Yet in the previous months, she adopted a careful and ambiguous stance, eventually expressing pride in “the right not to vote”. She never addressed the topics to the citizens, instead letting silence and uncertainty dissuade an already disillusioned electorate. Just days before the referendum, her statement about visiting the polling station “out of respect” for democracy but refusing to cast a ballot effectively amounted to a call for abstention.

The two Deputy Prime Ministers also avoided the issue. Lega’s Federal Secretary Matteo Salvini left the country to attend the French “Victory Day” celebration alongside allies like Marine Le Pen, Santiago Abascal, and Viktor Orbán. Forza Italia leader and Minister of Foreign Affairs Antonio Tajani, supposedly the coalition’s more moderate face, never revealed his voting intentions. Later he complained about the cost of sending ballots abroad.

This anti-vote messaging was echoed even more bluntly by President of the Senate Ignazio La Russa, a Mussolini enthusiast, who openly urged abstention, labelling the referendum irrelevant or politically divisive. Such public propaganda from the very top reflects a strategic choice: to let the referendum fail quietly, avoid political costs, and reinforce a well-worn narrative of a fragmented left incapable of challenging the government’s agenda.

Obediently, national media coverage was minimal to nonexistent. RAI’s television channels, pillars of Italian public discourse and notoriously influenced by whichever government is in power, barely reported on the vote. No debates. No analysis. Just silence. In a country where voter turnout has long been fragile, this traditional media blackout amounted to a quiet erasure, feeding collective amnesia. Meanwhile, opposition-led appeals circulated across social media, but digital noise rarely turns into real votes. Especially in a nation marked by uneven digital literacy and ageing demographics.

Still, the disconnect between politics and public attention cannot be blamed solely on media complicity or institutional sabotage. Yes, the silence was calculated, and it worked. But behind the abstention lies a deeper, more corrosive fatigue. Years of political immobilism have dulled expectations and hollowed out civic trust.

During the same days, more Italians followed Jannik Sinner’s Roland Garros run and feared the national football team’s risk of missing a third consecutive World Cup than taking action to defend their labour rights or legitimise the nation’s evolving multicultural reality. The government’s silence was merely an echo of a broader indifference. The referendum failed not simply because people were told to ignore it, but because, for many, caring has become an act of futility. In that silence, Italy didn’t just reject five referenda: it displayed the slow death of democratic hope.

The roar and echoes of silence

“Success wears out those who don’t have it.” Giulio Andreotti, one of Italy’s most enduring and controversial politicians, used this phrase to dismiss criticism of the corrosive nature of the long-standing power he relentlessly pursued. This masterclass in made-in-Italy political realism reveals the bitter frustration of facing defeat.

But the referendum’s democratic collapse wasn’t accidental: it was part of the design, leaving disappointment echoing in hollow void. The catastrophe of participation was a quiet victory for those in power: a clear reaffirmation of a strategy that feeds on disengagement. A government strong with the weak and weak with the strong, as evident in the newly approved Security Decree tightening laws on public order, right to protest, and immigration.

While the Democratic Party and CGIL remain unable to resolve internal conflicts and mobilise as one, the ruling coalition grows stronger without addressing the substance of any issue. Mors tua, vita mea: your death is my survival. The collapse of the vote allowed the ruling class to tighten its grip, shielded from consequence.

The referendum’s stakes were framed as marginal, disconnected from everyday life. Their defeat reinforced a politics indifferent to the vulnerable, to justice, or to any redistributive vision. The louder the silence, the firmer the hold.

This was more than a one-off failure. It revealed a distinctly Italian pathology: immobilism as political method. What often appears as inaction is actually calculated avoidance. Rooted not in ideology but in inertia, doing nothing becomes the safest move. Democracy is managed through discouragement and repression.

Silence is key: not absence, but orchestration. It is not just a by-product but the main event. From the government’s ambiguous cues to the media’s blackout, to the electorate’s weary apathy, this was no lack of noise. It was a choreographed mute performance.

The referendum didn’t just fail; it was buried under resignation, misdirection, and institutional complicity. Italy didn’t just skip a vote, it staged a ritual of civic abandonment: a slow-motion erosion where citizens are no longer persuaded, but sedated.

In the end, the silence wasn’t empty. It was full of signals, fears, choices. It wasn’t the absence of politics, but its most revealing expression. Today, silence is both the government’s weapon and the citizenry’s wound. It doesn’t whisper. It shouts. And its echo is everywhere.

Do you want to be informed of DiEM25's actions? Sign up here