Austrian elections: untamed ghosts

Austrian elections: untamed ghosts

A move to the right, further to the right, even to its extreme and a strong punch in the stomach for the aspirations of progressives. This sums up our reaction to yesterday’s Austrian election results. If anyone was thinking that the ghosts of nationalism, euro-scepticism and financial conservatism had been tamed, they should probably reconsider.
Before bewildering ourselves with terms like right-left, let’s recall the political legacy of the ÖVP-FPÖ (Austrian Peoples Party with Freedom Party of Austria) alliance, when they were leading the Austrian Nationalrat last time round, in 2000.
It is worth remembering that, then as now, when an ÖVP-SPÖ split in Parliament led to yesterday’s inevitable elections, this coalition came into being after a failure in negotiations with the socialists (SPÖ).
Then, as well as now, immigration policies played a crucial role in the political agenda. In 2000, after having granted political asylum to more than 90,000 Bosnians, fleeing from the bloody war at home, popular discontent went through the roof. This created the political vacuum and opportunity for the notorious FPÖ leader at that time, Jörg Haider, to push for a stricter and tighter immigration control.
In terms of the economy, “Mehr privat, weniger Staat” (More for the private sector, less for the state) was the mantra of those times. Any public stake in Austria’s commanding heights, such as Austria Tabak, VOEST or Telekom, had to be “liberalized”.  As a result, by more or less obscure routes and to a greater or lesser extent, these companies became politically clientelist. And behind the scenes there began to form what was probably one of the biggest corruption scandals in Austrian post-war history: the Eurofighter affair. This was finally exposed and this year, the Austrian state managed to prosecute Airbus, and committed itself to replacing them by 2020.
When it comes to education policies, 2001 saw the introduction of a highly controversial tuition fee for universities, which was finally abolished in 2008.
All in all, Austria, as a mediator between West and East, between Central Europe and the Balkans, plays a very important role in mirroring emerging trends in Europe. Voter results should be a wake-up call for progressive movements, like DiEM25, to push harder and stronger for their positions.
 
Bogdan is a member of DSC Bucharest, but also a humble engineer living in Munich. His main points of interest are socio-political issues of South-East Europe, as well as promoting DiEM25 there.
 

Do you want to be informed of DiEM25's actions? Sign up here

Should Le Pen be barred? What is the Left’s right answer on this conundrum?

This is a crucial conversation to have in general, not particularly about Marine Le Pen. It is about the principled position that the democratic ...

Read more

Yanis Varoufakis in London on April 11: Europe’s crackdown on democracy and Tony Benn tribute

Varoufakis will be in London this Friday for two major events: a press conference on the escalating threat to democracy in Europe and a special ...

Read more

Rotterdam for Peace: Screening ‘Eyes of Gaza’ in a time of genocide and rearmament

DiEM25's Rotterdam Collective is organising a screening of the film ‘Eyes of Gaza’ by director Mahmoud Atassi on 11 April 2025

Read more

Silencing Solidarity: Europe’s lawfare against pro-Palestine activism

These incidents are neither rare nor disconnected: they form part of a concerning pattern of suppression of pro-Palestinian activism visible ...

Read more