Italian Constitutional Referendum 2016

Why should Italy vote 'No' in tomorrow's referendum

While we’re developing together our vital Progressive Agenda for Europe, EU politics continues to get shaken up, as the establishment lurches from crisis to crisis.
Tomorrow will be the next pivotal moment: Italian citizens will vote in a referendum to amend their country’s constitution, which will have a clear European impact.
At the Coordinating Collective (CC), we received numerous requests from our members for DiEM25 to take a position on whether this proposed amendment should pass, and to campaign for it.
In line with our movement’s goal to democratise decision-making in the EU, as well as DiEM25’s pan-European essence, last month we asked our members in every corner of the Union to vote on which side we should be on: ‘yes’ or ‘no’.
A majority of the DiEM25 members and DSCs who took part in our internal democratic exercise (84.54%) recommended a ‘No’ vote.

Here is why:

If the amendment passes, it would hinder the democratic process in Italy. It would concentrate more power in the hands of the Italian government, reducing the role of Parliament, and diminish plurality by guaranteeing an absolute majority to the party with the most votes. Furthermore, the amendment would reduce the power of regions, hampering local autonomy.
But more broadly, the amendment would be yet another expression of the EU’s current demand for reliable national governments that can implement technocratic decisions without the nuisance of a political opposition and organised dissent. It would ensure we see more of the same “There Is No Alternative” rhetoric that has characterised the EU’s stance post-2008.

 

Do you want to be informed of DiEM25's actions? Sign up here

MERA25 protest for Tempi victims at Greek Independence Day parade in Athens

While Greek government officials were being peddled on the podiums at the Greek Independence Day parade, MERA25 was in Syntagma square demanding ...

Read more

Reclaiming resistance in an age of surveillance and authoritarianism

Meenakshi Thirukode looks at the criminalisation of dissent, the power of collective resistance, and highlights the urgent need to reclaim ...

Read more

Trump’s meeting with NATO chief proves who still guides the military alliance

Despite perceived US-NATO tensions, the future of the alliance is being dictated by one country: the United States

Read more

Europe in a state of emergency: The transformation into a military union and the risks of a catastrophic path

The decision by the EU to transform into a military union under the leadership of Von der Leyen represents a dangerous turn for Europe

Read more